Subject: RE: tech not draft attached
From: "Tuozzolo, Joseph E" <[email-masked]>
To: "Peggs, Stephen G" <[email-masked]>, "Brooks, Stephen" <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2017 12:31:14 +0000

Stephen Brooks

Excellent.  The magnet strength results distribution graph similar to the magnetization angular error results graph should be added as well.  Along with some discussion on shimming the PMM blocks to achieve the proper overall magnetic field strength in the magnets and the success of this.

Joe

From: Peggs, Stephen G
Sent: Thursday, April 27, 2017 3:43 PM
To: Brooks, Stephen <[email-masked]>
Cc: Tuozzolo, Joseph E <[email-masked]>
Subject: Re: tech not draft attached

looks fabulous at a first glance — thanks — beyond the call of duty!

I’m attaching a PDF here for Joe to see — Joe is also preparing some words, figures and numbers..

Thanks again,
Steve

---
CBETA Project Director
+1-631-344-3104  work
+1-631-834-1369  cell

On Apr 27, 2017, at 3:31 PM, Stephen Brooks <[email-masked]<mailto:[email-masked]>> wrote:

How's the attached?  Also includes all the versions of the photos.

  -Stephen

-----Original Message----- From: Peggs, Stephen G
Sent: 2017 April 26; Wednesday 17:20
To: Brooks, Stephen
Subject: Re: tech not draft attached

certainly no big parameter tables, or even short parameter tables.  Some comparison of measurements with specs is ok, but the focus here is one (or 2) page(s) per section, with measurement data presented in attractive and comprehensible graphics.  The audience is NYSERDA, primarily, remember.  No discussion of standalone specs, for example.

Steve

---
CBETA Project Director
+1-631-344-3104  work
+1-631-834-1369  cell

On Apr 26, 2017, at 5:08 PM, Stephen Brooks <[email-masked]<mailto:[email-masked]>> wrote:

By "no specifications" does that mean you don't want the magnets compared to the required specificiations?  Or just no big parameter tables?

-Stephen

-----Original Message----- From: Peggs, Stephen G
Sent: 2017 April 26; Wednesday 16:59
To: Trbojevic, Dejan
Cc: Brooks, Stephen
Subject: tech not draft attached

this should NOT be a long document.  A page or 2 for each of the 4 sections is more than adequate.  Measurements and 1 or 2 attractive graphics per section are desired, plus a paragraph or 2 or 3 of sensible words.

We don’t want design, simulation, or specifications.

And we don’t want to set the bar high with a high quality note that will have to be reproduced for the following 10 Technical Milestones.  There may come a time when we need to keep a similar TM tech note brief and obfuscatory.

No references.

Thanks,
Steve

---
CBETA Project Director
+1-631-344-3104  work
+1-631-834-1369  cell

<2017-04-27.zip>